CRM for trades, set up around how you work

Every provider below was read on its own page through our fetch box, and the row says what that page published on the day we read it. 10 of 49 publish a figure; the rest are listed too, because how many will not quote a number is the most useful thing about this market. Nothing here is a quote for your job: it is what other people advertise.

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through our fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2). 10 of the 49 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 39 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 10 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere. The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in GBP (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 214 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded. Derivation as chartered: one row per platform serving GB, each cell read from the VENDOR'S OWN page: the trades it names, the modules it ships, whether it applies VAT, the construction Domestic Reverse Charge and CIS deductions, which statutory certificates it generates (CP12/LGSR, EICR, MEIWC, F-Gas, OFTEC), which accounting packages it syncs to and whether Xero's own app store confirms it, whether it publishes a price at all, and its billing unit (per user, per job, per seat band, flat). The derivation nobody publishes is the COVERAGE MAP across all of them: how many platforms handle CIS, how many generate a Gas Safe record, how many bill per user against per job, and which combinations exist at each price band - the directories rank by review count and never once ask whether the software can issue a CP12

“UK Trades CRM Coverage Board”, CRM for trades, https://crmtrades.co.uk/ (updated 2026-09-21).